Site icon SSQI

ISO/IEC CD 15424 Information technology

ISO/IEC CD 15424 pertains to information technology and addresses data carrier identifiers (DCIDs). Specifically, it provides specifications for the symbology of machine-readable codes used in automated identification and data capture (AIDC) applications. These codes can be barcodes, RFID (radio frequency identification) tags, or other types of data carriers.

The standard defines how the identifiers should be constructed and how they should be encoded to ensure interoperability and proper recognition across different systems and applications. It is especially useful in logistics, supply chain management, and various industries where tracking and automated data capture are critical.

Is there a particular aspect of ISO/IEC CD 15424 that you are interested in exploring further?

What is required ISO/IEC CD 15424 Information technology

ISO/IEC CD 15424 (Committee Draft) is a standard under development that pertains to Information technology and specifically focuses on data carrier identifiers (DCIDs) in automated identification and data capture (AIDC) systems. It outlines how machine-readable codes (such as barcodes, RFID tags, and other data carriers) should be structured and encoded for interoperability and proper system recognition.

The key requirements and aspects involved in ISO/IEC CD 15424 include:

1. Data Carrier Identifiers (DCIDs)

2. Symbology and Encoding

3. Compatibility and Interoperability

4. Application Standards

5. Data Integrity

6. Format Specifications

7. Guidelines for Use

8. Compliance

This standard is particularly relevant in industries that rely heavily on automated systems for tracking, inventory, and data collection such as logistics, manufacturing, retail, and healthcare.

Would you like to explore any specific section or use case of this standard in more detail?

Who is required ISO/IEC CD 15424 Information technology

ISO/IEC CD 15424 (Information technology – Data Carrier Identifiers (DCIDs) in automated identification and data capture (AIDC) techniques) is primarily required by organizations and industries that rely on automated identification and data capture (AIDC) technologies for tracking, logistics, inventory management, and other automated data systems. The entities that are required to comply with or benefit from this standard include:

1. Manufacturing and Supply Chain Organizations

2. Retail Industry

3. Logistics and Transportation Companies

4. Healthcare and Pharmaceutical Industries

5. Retailers and Distributors

6. Government Agencies and Regulators

7. Technology Providers and Software Developers

8. Food and Beverage Industry

9. Defense and Aerospace

10. Automotive Industry

11. E-commerce and Online Retailers

12. Public Sector Entities

13. Customs and Border Agencies

In summary, any organization involved in automated data identification and capture technologies that rely on barcodes, RFID tags, or similar technologies for managing and tracking products or services would need to adopt ISO/IEC CD 15424 to ensure compatibility, accuracy, and interoperability across their systems.

When is required ISO/IEC CD 15424 Information technology

ISO/IEC CD 15424 (Information Technology – Data Carrier Identifiers in AIDC) is required in the following scenarios:

1. When Implementing Automated Identification and Data Capture (AIDC) Systems

2. When Ensuring Global Interoperability

3. When Enhancing Supply Chain and Inventory Management

4. When Meeting Regulatory and Compliance Requirements

5. When Developing or Procuring AIDC Hardware or Software

6. During Large-Scale Product Rollouts

7. When Enabling Supply Chain Traceability

8. When Implementing RFID or Barcode Standards

9. When Partnering with Organizations with AIDC Requirements

10. When Upgrading Legacy Systems

In summary, ISO/IEC CD 15424 is required whenever organizations need to implement, upgrade, or ensure compatibility for their automated identification and data capture systems. It ensures global interoperability, regulatory compliance, and effective tracking across industries and borders.

Where is required ISO/IEC CD 15424 Information technology

ISO/IEC CD 15424 pertains to “Information technology — Data Carrier Identifiers (including Symbology Identifiers).” It specifies a standard format for the unique identification of data carriers, which are technologies like barcodes and other automatic identification techniques used to track products, assets, and more. This standard is vital in industries where automatic data capture (ADC) systems are employed, such as logistics, manufacturing, retail, healthcare, and supply chain management.

Key areas where ISO/IEC 15424 is required include:

  1. Logistics and Supply Chain: For tracking products and packages through different stages of the supply chain.
  2. Retail: To standardize product identification via barcodes or RFID tags.
  3. Healthcare: To track medical devices, medicines, and patient data using standardized data carriers.
  4. Manufacturing: To identify parts, equipment, or components in automated processes.
  5. Warehousing and Inventory Management: For efficient inventory control using data carriers like barcodes or RFID systems.

This standard ensures interoperability between systems that use different types of data carriers across various industries and sectors.

How is required ISO/IEC CD 15424 Information technology

ISO/IEC CD 15424, which focuses on Data Carrier Identifiers (DCIs) for automatic identification and data capture technologies (like barcodes and RFID tags), is required in several ways to ensure standardization and interoperability. Here’s how it is used:

1. Data Carrier Identification

2. Interoperability Across Systems

3. Compliance with Industry Regulations

4. Enhanced Accuracy and Automation

5. Global Supply Chain Integration

In essence, ISO/IEC CD 15424 is required for improving the efficiency, accuracy, and interoperability of automated data capture systems across multiple sectors, making it critical for businesses engaged in tracking, tracing, and managing data associated with physical objects.

Case Study on ISO/IEC CD 15424 Information technology

Case Study: Implementation of ISO/IEC CD 15424 in a Retail Supply Chain

Company Background: ABC Retail is a mid-sized retail chain operating in the consumer goods sector, with multiple locations across the country. The company faced challenges in inventory management, product traceability, and efficient checkout processes due to varying identification systems used across its supply chain. The management decided to implement ISO/IEC CD 15424 to standardize data carrier identifiers and improve operational efficiency.


Problem Statement

ABC Retail struggled with:


Implementation Steps

  1. Assessment and Planning
    • Conducted a thorough assessment of existing data carrier systems across all supply chain partners.
    • Identified the need for a unified standard and trained stakeholders on ISO/IEC CD 15424 principles.
  2. Standardization of Data Carriers
    • Collaborated with suppliers to transition all products to comply with ISO/IEC 15424 standards for data carrier identifiers.
    • Adopted uniform symbology identifiers across all products, ensuring compatibility with the company’s scanning systems.
  3. System Integration
    • Upgraded scanning systems and point-of-sale (POS) terminals to support the new standardized data carrier identifiers.
    • Integrated the new identifiers into the inventory management software for real-time tracking and reporting.
  4. Training and Development
    • Provided training sessions for employees on the new system and its benefits, emphasizing the importance of accurate scanning and inventory management.
  5. Testing and Feedback
    • Conducted a pilot test in a select store to evaluate the effectiveness of the new system.
    • Gathered feedback from staff and adjusted processes based on real-world usage.

Results

  1. Improved Inventory Accuracy
    • Reduced inventory discrepancies by 30% within the first quarter post-implementation, leading to better stock management and reduced waste.
  2. Enhanced Traceability
    • Enabled quicker product recalls, with the ability to trace products back to suppliers in real-time, enhancing compliance with regulations and increasing consumer safety.
  3. Increased Operational Efficiency
    • Streamlined checkout processes, resulting in a 25% reduction in checkout times due to faster scanning of standardized barcodes.
  4. Cost Savings
    • Decreased labor costs associated with inventory audits by 20%, as employees could rely on automated systems instead of manual checks.
  5. Supplier Relations
    • Strengthened relationships with suppliers who appreciated the standardized approach, resulting in improved collaboration and faster replenishment cycles.

Conclusion

The implementation of ISO/IEC CD 15424 at ABC Retail significantly improved their operational efficiency, product traceability, and inventory management. By standardizing data carrier identifiers, the company not only enhanced its internal processes but also fostered better relationships with suppliers and ensured compliance with industry regulations. This case demonstrates the importance of adopting standardized practices in enhancing overall supply chain effectiveness.

White Paper on ISO/IEC CD 15424 Information technology

White Paper on ISO/IEC CD 15424: Information Technology – Data Carrier Identifiers

Abstract

The rapid growth of automatic identification and data capture (AIDC) technologies has revolutionized how organizations manage and track products across various industries. ISO/IEC CD 15424 establishes a standardized approach for Data Carrier Identifiers (DCIs), including symbology identifiers for barcodes and RFID tag identifiers. This white paper discusses the significance, implementation, benefits, and challenges of adopting ISO/IEC CD 15424 to enhance interoperability, accuracy, and efficiency in data capture systems.

Introduction

As businesses increasingly rely on AIDC technologies to streamline operations, the need for standardized identification systems has become paramount. ISO/IEC CD 15424 provides a framework for unifying the way data carriers are identified and interpreted, facilitating seamless data exchange across diverse systems. This standard is critical for sectors such as logistics, retail, healthcare, and manufacturing, where efficient data capture and traceability are essential.

Background

1. Understanding Data Carrier Identifiers

2. Importance of Standardization

Key Features of ISO/IEC CD 15424

ISO/IEC CD 15424 encompasses several key features that facilitate the effective implementation of Data Carrier Identifiers:

  1. Symbology Identifiers: Establishes a standardized way to identify different types of barcode symbologies, ensuring consistent interpretation across various systems.
  2. RFID Tag Identifiers: Provides guidelines for RFID tag identification, allowing for seamless integration of RFID technology into existing systems.
  3. Interoperability Guidelines: Offers protocols that ensure data carriers can be recognized and processed by different AIDC systems globally.

Implementation of ISO/IEC CD 15424

1. Assessment of Existing Systems

2. Collaboration with Stakeholders

3. Integration into Existing Infrastructure

4. Monitoring and Feedback

Benefits of ISO/IEC CD 15424

  1. Enhanced Accuracy: Standardization reduces errors in data capture, leading to improved inventory management and reduced costs associated with discrepancies.
  2. Improved Traceability: Facilitates quick identification and tracking of products, enhancing compliance with industry regulations and improving customer safety.
  3. Increased Efficiency: Streamlines checkout and inventory processes, resulting in faster transaction times and improved customer experiences.
  4. Cost Savings: Reduces labor costs associated with manual data entry and inventory audits, leading to significant financial benefits.
  5. Interoperability: Ensures that different systems can communicate effectively, facilitating smoother operations across supply chains.

Challenges in Implementation

Despite its advantages, organizations may face several challenges when adopting ISO/IEC CD 15424:

  1. Resistance to Change: Employees and stakeholders may be resistant to new systems and processes, necessitating effective change management strategies.
  2. Costs of Upgrading Systems: Initial investment in new technology and training can be significant, potentially deterring some organizations from adopting the standard.
  3. Complexity of Integration: Integrating the new identifiers into existing systems can be complex, requiring careful planning and execution.

Conclusion

ISO/IEC CD 15424 is a vital standard for organizations seeking to enhance their data capture processes through the use of Data Carrier Identifiers. By standardizing the way data carriers are identified and processed, businesses can improve operational efficiency, accuracy, and traceability, ultimately leading to better decision-making and customer satisfaction. While challenges exist, the long-term benefits of adopting ISO/IEC CD 15424 far outweigh the initial hurdles, positioning organizations for success in an increasingly data-driven world.

Recommendations


This white paper provides a comprehensive overview of ISO/IEC CD 15424 and its significance in modern information technology, emphasizing its role in improving data capture efficiency and interoperability across industries.

  1. “Global 500”Fortune. Retrieved 31 October 2020.
  2. ^ “Amazon.com | 2020 Global 500”Fortune. Retrieved 31 October 2020.
  3. ^ “The ‘Big Five’ Could Destroy the Tech Ecosystem”. Bloomberg. 15 November 2017.
  4. ^ “Tech companies dominate as the most innovative in the world”BusinessTech. 28 October 2017. Retrieved 9 July 2018.
  5. ^ Kit Eaton (24 July 2012). “The Silicon Valleys Of The World: The European Edition”. Fast Company. Retrieved 9 July 2018.
  6.  “Definition of Interoperability”dedicated website for a Definition of Interoperability at interoperability-definition.info. Copyright AFUL under CC BY-SA. Archived from the original on 2017-03-14. Retrieved 2017-03-13.
  7. ^ Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries. New York, NY: 1990.
  8. ^ Slater, T. (2012). “What is Interoperability?”. Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium. Archived from the original on 2014-07-14.
  9. ^ Slater, T. “Cross-Domain Interoperability”[usurped]Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium – NCOIC[usurped], 2013
  10. ^ Vercruysse, Kim; Dawson, David A.; Wright, Nigel (2019). “Interoperability: A conceptual framework to bridge the gap between multifunctional and multisystem urban flood management”Journal of Flood Risk Management12 (S2): e12535. Bibcode:2019JFRM…12E2535Vdoi:10.1111/jfr3.12535ISSN 1753-318X.
  11. ^ Fenner, Richard; o’Donnell, Emily; Ahilan, Sangaralingam; Dawson, David; Kapetas, Leon; Krivtsov, Vladimir; Ncube, Sikhululekile; Vercruysse, Kim (2019), “Achieving Urban Flood Resilience in an Uncertain Future”, Water11 (5): 1082, doi:10.3390/w11051082hdl:10871/37244
  12. ^ “Urban Flood Resilience”www.urbanfloodresilience.ac.uk. Retrieved 2019-05-15.
  13. ^ NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions, NATO AAP-06[permanent dead link]
  14. ^ Interoperability: A continuing Challenge in Coalition Air Operations – Chapter 2 “A broad Definition of Interoperability”, by Myron Hura, Gary McLeod, James Schneider and others, RAND Monograph Report, 2000, [1] Archived 2013-10-19 at the Wayback Machine
  15. ^ Allen, D. K., Karanasios, S., & Norman, A. (2013). Information sharing and interoperability: the case of major incident management. European Journal of Information Systems, 10.1057/ejis.2013.8.
  16. ^ Baldini, G. (2010). Report of the workshop on “Interoperable communications for Safety and Security”. Ispra: European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen.
  17. ^ “Interoperability system bridges communications gap”FireRescue1. Archived from the original on 2017-02-02. Retrieved 2017-01-25.
  18. ^ Grier, Robin. “Interoperability Solutions”Interoperability. Catalyst Communications. Retrieved 28 May 2011.
  19. ^ “FATPOT Technologies”. Archived from the original on 2018-07-10. Retrieved 2019-09-08.
  20. ^ “SIEC”. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  21. ^ “SAFECOM – Homeland Security”. Archived from the original on 2014-12-21. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  22. ^ “Apple opposes EU plans to make common charger port for all devices”The Guardian. 23 September 2021. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
  23. ^ Peltier, Elian (23 September 2021). “In a setback for Apple, the European Union seeks a common charger for all phones”The New York Times. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
  24. ^ “One common charging solution for all”Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs – European Commission. 5 July 2016. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
  25. ^ Open Search Environments: The Free Alternative to Commercial Search Services
  26. ^ Gordon and Hernandez (2016-05-16). The Official Guide to the SSCP Book. SYBEX. ISBN 978-1119278634.
  27. ^ SC36 Secretariat (2003-11-13). “Proposed Draft Technical Report for: ISO/IEC xxxxx, Information technology — Learning, education, and training — Management and delivery — Specification and use of extensions and profiles” (PDF). ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-11-29. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  28. ^ “Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration”. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  29. ^ “OSLC (Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration): open standard for i…”. 30 November 2011. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  30. ^ 9. Java and JVM Interoperability [Book].
  31. ^ Thomas, Ben (5 March 2013). “Invalid Files and Language Learning: Your Brain’s Interoperable World”. Huffington Post. Retrieved 13 March 2013.
  32. ^ Bandoim, Lana. “Unified Interoperability as the Alternative to Big Data Costs?”. Yahoo! Voices. Retrieved 13 March 2013.
  33. Jump up to:a b Moran, Andrew. “Tech leaders collaborate, unite over unified interoperability”Digital Journal. Retrieved 13 March 2013.
  34. ^ “Next Generation Data Interoperability: It’s all About the Metadata” (PDF). Whitemarsh Information Systems Corporation. Retrieved 13 March 2013.
  35. ^ “Interoperability: What Is It and Why Should I Want It?”Ariadne. Retrieved 13 March 2013.
  36. ^ MP Gallaher; AC O’Connor; JL Dettbarn, Jr.; LT Gilday (August 2004). Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry (PDF) (Report). National Institute of Standards and Technology. p. iv. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-02-04. Retrieved 2012-04-19.
  37. ^ “e-Government Interoperability A comparative analysis of 30 countries” (PDF). CS Transform. 2010. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved 21 January 2016.
  38. ^ CIMIT – Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology – the MD PnP Program on Medical Device Interoperability
  39. ^ “RAPS Preview: FDA CDRH Director Shuren Talks Priorities”. September 19, 2016. Retrieved April 8, 2017.
  40. ^  This article incorporates public domain material from Federal Standard 1037CGeneral Services Administration. Archived from the original on 2022-01-22. (in support of MIL-STD-188).
  41. ^  This article incorporates public domain material from Dictionary of Military and Associated TermsUnited States Department of Defense.
  42. ^ Eastman, Charles M., and Eastman, Chuck (2008) BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors John Wiley & Sons, pp.72-73.
  43. ^ “European Land Information Service”. Archived from the original on 2008-03-31. Retrieved 2008-10-19.
  44. ^ Design, Erskine. “Welcome – EULIS”. Archived from the original on 17 September 2016. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  45. ^ “European Interoperability Framework (EIF)”.
  46. ^ IoT Semantic Interoperability: Research Challenges, Best Practices, Recommendations and Next Steps (PDF), European Research Cluster on the Internet of Things, March 2015
  47. ^ Morris, KC; Kulvatunyou, Serm; Frechette, Simon; Lubell, Josh; Goyal, Puja (December 2004). “XML Schema Validation Process for CORE.GOV” (PDF). Manufacturing Systems Integration Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved 13 June 2023.
  48. ^ NIEMOpen
  49.  System Analysis and Design for the Global Enterprise by Lonnie D. Bentley p.160 7th edition
  50. ^ SYSTEMS ANALYSIS
  51. ^ Tom Ritchey, Analysis and Synthesis.
  52. ^ Radin, Beryl A. (2000). Beyond Machiavelli : policy analysis comes of age. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. ISBN 0878407731OCLC 41834855.
  53. ^ Géza HUSI: Mechatronics Control Systems
  54. System Analysis and Design for the Global Enterprise by Lonnie D. Bentley p.160 7th edition
  55. ^ SYSTEMS ANALYSIS
  56. ^ Tom Ritchey, Analysis and Synthesis.
  57. ^ Radin, Beryl A. (2000). Beyond Machiavelli : policy analysis comes of age. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. ISBN 0878407731OCLC 41834855.
  58. ^ Géza HUSI: Mechatronics Control Systems

Exit mobile version